just now, on the way back from skool, i listened to mixfm/hitzfm (cant recall which one) n there's a celeb news about that bond guy, Daniel Craig. apparently there's been an anti-Daniel Craig campaign launched against him. so they seem to share my first impression when judging him - that is he's not bond enough - why? coz he "a short, blond actor with the rough face of a professional boxer and a penchant for playing killers, cranks, cads and gigolos."
but i think that's such an unfair comment to make on him.yeah he's blond. but Brosnan looks even more 'gigolo' than him though. well, of course Sean Connery is out of comparison . he's like a vintage car.or an old painting. the older you get the more valuable you become.hehe. off record - my mum likes him a lot (shhh). i really personally feel that Craig deserves a credit. even my bond-lover pals said this one is the best bond movie they've seen so far. cant comment on that either coz i dont watch much bond films.
skool life ; pheewwww merci merci merci merci beaucouuuuuuuuup Prof Peter JamesLlee!!! for extending the portfolio submission dateline, not for another week, but for another month!!! hihihihik, THANK YOU! but the public health things erghh, i dunno , i did love statistic subject during A Level, but now, i just simply hate all the terms. standard deviation, outliers, interquartile range, frequency polygon n God-knows-what-else. we'll be dumped at baling for three weeks this january to do our so called 'research' on Baling's babies n mums. Apparently the percentage of neonatal jaundice (demam kuning in babies) in Baling is remarkably higher than malaysia's average. n our job is to determine and establish the risk factors. hmmm, just hope it'd be a nice trip. Baling, be nice to us.
No comments:
Post a Comment